USPTO serial 97889543
ROSE HAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STURMAN, MELISSA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROSE HAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Zhengzhou Saishi E-Commerce Co., Ltd.
Zhengzhou City, Henan, CN
Other trademarks owned by Zhengzhou Saishi E-Commerce Co., Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan Pitt
BRYAN PITT KUNZLER BEAN & ADAMSON, PC50 WEST BROADWAY, 10TH FLOORSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Braids; Hairpieces; Toupees; Wigs; Clown wigs; False hair; Hair bows; Hair curlers, electrically-heated, other than hand implements; Hair elastics; Hair extensions; Hair netting; Hair ornaments in the form of combs; Hair pieces and wigs; Hair weaves; Hair wraps, bonnets and caps used as applicators for hair conditioners; Human braiding hair; Rubber bands for hair; Synthetic braiding hair; Wig caps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2023 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |