USPTO serial 97898618
INTELLIFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DETMER, CAROLYN ROSE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal E. Friedman
Neal E. Friedman Secant IP, PLLC55 South Commercial Street, Suite B14MANCHESTER, NH 03101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Prefabricated building for blockchain and cryptocurrency mining operations made substantially of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Liquid immersion cooling systems comprised of liquid baths and air-cooled heat exchangers not being parts of machines for computer components for use in blockchain and cryptocurrency mining operations | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electrical power distribution unit ("PDU"), namely, Smart PDUs; electrical power distribution systems, being power distribution panels, for modular computer components for use in blockchain and cryptocurrency mining operations; Power distribution system consisting of electric cables, electric switches, electric breakers, electric control panel; electric relays; electric connectors; electric connector housings; electric transformers; electric power distribution units; electrical distribution boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Consulting services in the field of modular data center management, being immersion cooling and power supply for modular building for blockchain and cryptocurrency mining operations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 29, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2023 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 2, 2023 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |