USPTO serial 97900621
BETNOMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADORNO SANTOS, LUZ M.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BETNOMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
McLeansville, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUSTIN JOHANSON
JUSTIN JOHANSON RLAS4050 S. 500 W., SUITE 50 DPT# 14057SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84123UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of video game tournaments; Entertainment in the nature of casino gambling tournaments; Entertainment services, namely, providing online multiplayer video games; Gaming services in the nature of online computer game tournaments; Gaming services in the nature of video games; Online gaming services in the nature of casino gambling; Online gaming services in the nature of sports gaming; Providing entertainment information about video game tournaments and competitions via a website; Providing entertainment information via a website; Providing entertainment information in the field of video games via a website; Arranging of contests featuring casino gaming and/or sports gaming; Entertainment services, namely, providing a website for on-line gambling; Gaming services in the nature of casino gaming; Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles, brochures, blog posts, and/or videos in the field(s) of video games; Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles, brochures, blog posts, and/or videos in the field(s) of gaming events; Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles, brochures, blog posts, and/or videos in the field(s) of games and entertainment; Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles, brochures, blog posts, and/or videos in the field(s) of sports gaming; Providing an on-line computer web site notifying individuals that they have won a lottery or other forms of gambling, where one or more winning numbers have been picked; Providing online non-downloadable videos in the field of video games and/or video game reviews; Providing online non-downloadable videos in the field of casino gambling | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |