USPTO serial 97902318
SUBSTANTIALLY EQUIVALENT PRICING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDANI, CAITLIN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUBSTANTIALLY EQUIVALENT PRICING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical instruments and apparatus; Surgical instruments for fitting hip joint implants and their parts; Surgical instruments for use in ophthalmic surgery; Surgical instruments for use in orthopedic surgery; Surgical instruments for use in orthopedic and spinal surgery; Surgical instruments for use in spinal surgery; Surgical instruments for use in orthopedic or spinal surgery; Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery; Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgery; Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic or spinal surgery; Surgical apparatus and instruments; Surgical apparatus and instruments for dental use; Surgical apparatus and instruments for medical use; Surgical apparatus and instruments for medical, dental or veterinary use; Surgical apparatus and instruments for use in ophthalmic surgery; Surgical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgery; Surgical apparatus and instruments for veterinary use; Surgical devices and instruments; Surgical implants comprising artificial material and associated surgical instrument sets; Apparatus and instruments used in foot surgery; Electro-surgical motors being part of surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery; Medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, devices used in orthopedic surgery to position surgical instruments, implants and/or patients' limbs; Medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, orthopedic fixation device used in orthopedic transplant and/or implant surgery; Medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, vertebral osteosynthesis staple-shaped apparatus and instruments; Medical apparatus and instruments for use in surgery; Medical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgery; Medical bags adapted for and sold with medical, surgical and veterinary instruments; Medical device and surgical instrument for use in diagnosis and surgery of the gastro-intestinal tract; Medical trays for storage, shipping, sterilization of medical or surgical instruments; Percutaneous vein harvesting instrument used to harvest the saphenous vein from the leg for use in coronary bypass surgery | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |