Drawing for DHLAB SINCE 2009

USPTO serial 97904779

DHLAB SINCE 2009

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DHLAB SINCE 2009?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

bin lu

2157 ROYAL LODGE DRFALLS CHURCH, VA 22043United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Natural cosmetics; Non-medicated cosmetics; Organic cosmeticsACTIVE—
005Dietary beverage supplements for human consumption in liquid and dry mix form for therapeutic purposes; Dietary supplement beverage for promoting healthy living; Dietary supplement drink mixes; Dietary supplements; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary food supplements; Medicated cosmeticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2024ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2023MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 22, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance