USPTO serial 97906343
SUPERSHARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERSHARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ZACHARY T. GORDON
ZACHARY T. GORDON ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.10220 ARISTOCRAT WAYLAS VEGAS, NV 89135United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | organization, operation, and supervision of an incentive scheme in the nature of stock purchase plans and related transactions | ACTIVE | Mar 13, 2019 |
| 036 | contributory benefit scheme services in the nature of administration of an employee stock purchase plan; share management in the nature of administration of an employee stock purchase plan; share services in the nature of administration of an employee stock purchase plan; securities management in the nature of administration of an employee stock purchase plan; investment account services in the nature of administration of an employee stock purchase plan; financial investment fund services in the nature of administration of an employee stock purchase plan | ACTIVE | Mar 13, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |