Drawing for MERITUS

USPTO serial 97922155

MERITUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERITUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ian G. DiBernardo

Ian G. DiBernardo BROWN RUDNICK LLP7 TIMES SQUARENEW YORK, NY 10036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management analysis; Business statistical analysis; Business data analysis; Business analysis of markets; Business data analysis services; Analysis of business data; Analysis of business information; Consultancy relating to business analysis; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business analysis; Computerized database management; Statistical analysis and reporting services for business purposesACTIVEMar 20, 2009
036Financial analysis; Financial analysis services; Financial evaluation and analysis; Financial analysis and consultancy; Financial analysis and consultation; Financial analysis and information services; Financial information, management and analysis services; Financial management, analysis and information services; Financial analysis and consultancy servicesACTIVEMar 20, 2009
042Development of software application solutions; Development of computer software application solutions; Development services relating to computer software application solutions; Research, design and development services relating to software application solutionsACTIVEMar 20, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 17, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 14, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 13, 2024IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 7, 2024AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 7, 2024IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 7, 2024EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2024ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 5, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Apr 30, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance