USPTO serial 97922242
GREENLYTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREENLYTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. SCOTT GERIEN
J. SCOTT GERIEN DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY1500 FIRST STREETSTE 200NAPA, CA 94559Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit beverages and fruit juices; fruit flavored carbonated beverages; fruit-based soft drinks flavored with tea; agave juice beverages; coconut-based beverages not being milk substitutes; non-alcoholic malt drinks, all the foregoing containing or solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and not containing cannabidiol (CBD) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |