Drawing for CIAO!

USPTO serial 97923449

CIAO!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FREEMAN, BREANNA SHALEISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIAO!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danielle DeFilippis

Danielle DeFilippis NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN P.A.7 TIMES SQUARE, 21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Disposable cutlery kits comprised primarily of plastic cutlery in the nature of table cutlery, paper napkins, salt and black pepperACTIVE—
016Paper bagsACTIVE—
021Plastic champagne flutes; plastic catering utensils, namely, serving scoops, serving trays not of precious metal, disposable serving spoons; disposable plastic catering serving trays; paper and plastic school lunch serving traysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2026EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2026EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2026EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 1, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2025EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2025TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 26, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2025NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2025DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 13, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2025EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 23, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2025INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jun 26, 2025AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 26, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 20, 2024DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2024ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance