USPTO serial 97927491
CYBERSECURITY STANDUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIRIGNANO, EMMA MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBERSECURITY STANDUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq. GERBEN PERROTT, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW, SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for combining data stored in cloud service providers and cloud-based hosts; Downloadable software for ensuring compliance with security requirements; downloadable software for testing cloud security; downloadable software for producing compliance reports; downloadable software for detecting data breaches; downloadable software for investigating the source of data breaches; Downloadable computer software for monitoring computer security incidents and running reports on cloud computing configuration and metadata; Downloadable computer software designed to be deployed on web servers for monitoring computer security incidents and running reports on cloud computing configuration and metadata; Recorded computer software designed to be deployed on web servers for monitoring computer security incidents and running reports on cloud computing configuration and metadata; Downloadable cloud-computing software for monitoring computer security incidents and running reports on cloud computing configuration and metadata | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to combine data stored in cloud service providers and cloud-based hosts; Providing online, non-downloadable software for combining data stored in cloud service providers and cloud-based hosts; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to find data vulnerabilities; Providing online, non-downloadable software for finding data vulnerabilities; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to ensure compliance with security requirements; Providing online, non-downloadable software for ensuring compliance with security requirements; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to test cloud security; Providing online, non-downloadable software for testing cloud security; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to produce compliance reports; Providing online, non-downloadable software for producing compliance reports; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to detect data breaches; Providing online, non-downloadable software for detecting data breaches; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to investigate the source of data breaches; Providing online, non- downloadable software for investigating the source of data breaches; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to monitor computer security incidents and run reports on cloud computing configuration and metadata; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to monitor computer security incidents and running reports on cloud computing configuration and metadata | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |