USPTO serial 97937661
GOOD ZEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAGIT, JACOB FLEMING
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOOD ZEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
irvine, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services; Booking of catering services for others; Brasserie services; Breakfast restaurants; Canteen services; Catering of food and drinks; Chinese restaurant services; Consulting in the field of restaurant menu development; Contract food and beverage services; Decorating of food; Fast casual restaurants; Fast-food restaurant services; Food and drink catering; Food preparation; Food reviewing services provided by food critics; Hotel accommodation, motel, restaurant, bar and catering services; Making reservations and bookings for restaurants and meals; Mobile catering; Mobile restaurant services; Personal chef services; Pop-up restaurant services; Preparation of food and beverages; Providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; Providing community centers for social gatherings and meetings; Providing facilities for exhibitions; Providing facilities for fairs and exhibitions; Providing general purpose pavilion facilities for shelter, concerts, exhibitions and other functions; Providing information about bar services; Providing information, news and commentary in the field of dining; Providing of food and drink; Providing reviews of food by food critics; Providing reviews of restaurants and bars; Providing reviews of restaurants by restaurant critics; Rental of chafing dishes; Reservation of restaurants; Restaurant and bar services, including restaurant carryout services; Restaurant and catering services; Restaurant information services; Restaurant services; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Restaurants; Restaurants featuring home delivery; Serving beverages in brewpubs; Snack bar and canteen services; Take-away restaurant services | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |