USPTO serial 97975024
RHINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANG, PETER T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RHINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Abraham Lichy
Abraham Lichy THE LICHY LAW FIRM, P.C.222 E 68TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Healthcare and medical consultancy, information and advisory services; Telehealth services, namely, providing healthcare and health-related information via telecommunication technologies; Providing a website for medical professionals featuring medical information related to remote telehealth patient monitoring, consulting and diagnosis; Healthcare services, namely, integrated telehealth management being disease management programs, telehealth and remote patient monitoring clinical services and nursing services for medical diagnosis and treatment purposes; Providing a website for medical professionals featuring medical information from remote locations via electronic patient monitoring and consulting devices that feed information to the website that can be accessed in real-time and through cloud computing by medical professionals for purposes of monitoring and diagnosing medical conditions and consulting with patients; Providing a website and related platform featuring technology that enables patients and healthcare providers to participate in remote telehealth services, including for scheduling and tracking medical patient appointments, monitoring of medical conditions and real-time communication; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable cloud computing software for electronic storage of patient and telehealth data, collecting, integrating, translating and managing patient and telehealth data, and providing controlled access service to maintain databases of patient health information and provide access to such information to healthcare providers and healthcare institutions; Platform-as-a-service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for backend workflow management and video-enabled synchronous communication systems to improve care coordination, patient engagement, and telehealth services for healthcare systems and providers; Computer software development, computer system design and integration services, namely, providing physician web portals and applications to enable electronic health records, electronic health information exchange, and telehealth and computer technology support services, namely, help desk services to support patients, physicians and other healthcare professionals using telehealth systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2024 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 13, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 11, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |