Drawing for POWER BOOSTER

USPTO serial 97975217

POWER BOOSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 616
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, TARYN E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER BOOSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Ling

Steven Ling JOSEPH WORLDWIDE COUNSELS16F, NO.482, SEC. 5, ZHONGXIAO EAST ROADTAIPEI CITY, 11083TAIWAN

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Household or kitchen utensils, cookware, and containers, namely, kitchen containers, cooking vessels in the nature of heat-insulated vessels, non-electric pressure cookers, non-electric deep fryers, non-electric ice cream makers, non-electric yogurt makersACTIVEMar 20, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2023AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2023IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jul 12, 2023AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 12, 2023IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 11, 2023EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2023MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2023DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 14, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 14, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2023GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2023GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2023NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2022AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2022PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2022INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Nov 29, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 21, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2021MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2021NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance