USPTO serial 97975874
SOBREMESA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARREDA, AMBER KYLEE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOBREMESA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mount Pleasant, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Andrew Gowder, Jr.
W. Andrew Gowder, Jr. AUSTEN & GOWDER, LLC1629 MEETING STREET, SUITE ACHARLESTON, SC 29405UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Salsa; Sauces | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2024 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Mar 13, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2023 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 7, 2023 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2023 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 25, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2023 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| May 8, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2023 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |