USPTO serial 97976153
ONVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUILICI, BRENDAN A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.4000 LEGATO RD SUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Car Maintenance and Repair for electric vehicles; Carrier maintenance service in the nature of maintenance of electric motor vehicles; Delivery electric vehicle repair services; Repair and maintenance of electric vehicles; Auto Body Repair services; Customized installation of car interiors; Building construction information; Construction equipment rental; Mining extraction services; Upholstery repairs; Heating equipment installation and repair; Mechanical installation, maintenance and repair, namely, the installation, maintenance, and repair of electric vehicles; Furniture maintenance; Disinfection of surgical instruments, furniture, electric vehicles; Installation and repair of antitheft alarm system; Eliminate interference from electronic devices in the nature of interference suppression services for electronic devices; Installation and repair of medical equipment; Anti-rust services, namely, anti-rust treatment of vehicles; Leather care, cleaning and repair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2025 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 25, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 18, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2023 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |