USPTO serial 97976221
NAMESAKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAYABYAB, EDWARD TAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NAMESAKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pico Rivera, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danton K. Mak
Danton K. Mak LEECH TISHMAN FUSCALDO & LAMPL, INC.SUITE 101-301556 SOUTH FAIR OAKS AVENUEPASADENA, CA 91105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Baby bedding, namely, bundle bags, swaddling blankets, crib bumpers, crib sheets, crib skirts, crib blankets, and diaper changing pad covers not of paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 5, 2023 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |