USPTO serial 97978154
TRUESIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRENDAN K
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRUESIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURA C. MILLER
LAURA C. MILLER KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP1001 WEST FOURTH STREETWINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101-2400UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable augmented reality software for virtual product try-on experiences; electronically recorded data on computer media in the field of consumer retail goods; electronic databases in the field of consumer retail goods recorded on computer media; downloadable augmented reality software for use in mobile devices for integrating electronic data with real world environments for virtual product try-on experiences; downloadable computer software for the marketing, advertising, and promotion of consumer retail goods; Recorded computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for virtual product try-on experiences; Downloadable computer software for use as an application programming interface (API); Downloadable network access server operating software; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for machine learning; Downloadable machine learning software for product try-on experiences; Downloadable computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network | ACTIVE | May 20, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2024 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |