USPTO serial 97978883
MELO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NANNEY, KATHERINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MELO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca Liebowitz
Rebecca Liebowitz VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Dried kava powder for use in making non-alcoholic sparkling root- and plant-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 16, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |