USPTO serial 97979131
CEDAR EDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2025
- Examiner
- IP, KENNINA NGA-YU
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with CEDAR EDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Devon E. White
Devon E. White WYRICK ROBBINS YATES & PONTON LLP4101 LAKE BOONE TRAIL, SUITE 300RALEIGH, NC 27607United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Technical training services in the field of electronic design | ACTIVE | Dec 4, 2021 |
| 042 | Design and development services, namely, design and development of custom software and hardware for use in electronic design; Providing information in the field of electronic design; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) featuring software for use in electronic design; Technology consulting services in the technology field of electronic design; Consulting services in the field of electronic product design and design implementation; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) featuring software for use in electronic design, namely, computer programs for electronic design automation; hardware enabled software as a service featuring software, used in connection with computer hardware, for use in electronic design automation; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) featuring software for use in electronic design, namely, computer programs for simulation of physical systems; hardware enabled software as a service featuring software, used in connection with computer hardware, for simulation of physical systems in the field of electronic design; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) featuring software for use in electronic design, namely, computer software for simulation, visualization, and design of physical systems; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) featuring computer software and electronic design automation software tools for use in electronic design; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning systems for use in electronic design automation; Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) featuring software utilizing pre-trained machine learning models leveraging Scientific Machine Learning and equation-based digital twin modeling for simulation, visualization, and design of physical systems; Design and development of custom computer hardware and software, namely, design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) software and machine learning systems and computer hardware therefor, all the foregoing for use in electronic design automation and electronic design; Providing information regarding artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning systems in the field of electronic design; Technology consulting services regarding artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning systems in the technology field of electronic design; Technology consulting services regarding computer software and toolkit being software tools in the field of electronic design; Providing on-line information in the field of electronic design, namely, information regarding the design and validation of integrated circuits, semiconductors, printed circuit boards, electronic systems, and gateware for field-programmable gate arrays | ACTIVE | Dec 4, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Julia Computing, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by JULIAHUB, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JULIAHUB, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JULIAHUB, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CEDAR EDA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2025 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2025 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2024 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 9, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |