USPTO serial 97980219
RUBBLE & CREW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANCHEZ RIVERA, MARIA C.
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).
Need help with RUBBLE & CREW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Wright
William C. Wright EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP6 East 45th Street, 7th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, games and playthings, namely, plush toys, toy animals, stuffed toy animals, toy figures, collectible toy figures, toy vehicles, toy construction sets, construction toys, toy construction vehicles, toy building sets being building games, toy building and accessories therefor, toy building blocks, toy tools, toy tool sets being toy sets of carpenters' tools, children's multiple activity toys featuring interactive activities and digital applications, children's educational toys for developing fine motor, cognitive, and counting skills, ride-on toys, parlour games, jigsaw puzzles, manipulative puzzles, 3D puzzles, role-playing games, card games, board games, interactive board games, action skill games, action target games, electronic hand-held units for playing electronic games for use with external display screen or monitor, electronic action toys, bath toys, inflatable pool toys, beach toys in the nature of beach balls and sand toys; novelty items, namely, party favours in the nature of small toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 14, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |