USPTO serial 97980658
FINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 694
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sainte-Marguerite, CA
Sainte-Marguerite, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin M. Cantor
Benjamin M. Cantor CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH STREET22ND FLOORHARTFORD, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Components for spas, hot tubs and whirlpool bathtubs and hand dryers, namely, air blowers; components for spas, hot tubs, whirlpool bathtubs and hand dryers, namely, air therapy fixtures in the nature of jets that blow heated air into bath water, manifolds, air blowers and fittings kits therefor, whirlpool pumps, whirlpool jets, air control devices, namely, a mechanical control incorporating a venturi system comprising whirlpool jet to deliver air into a whirlpool system, water jet fixtures, control systems comprising an electronic panels used to drive different therapy systems, RGB lights being a surface and an underwater chromatherapy systems using red-green-blue lights, micro-bubbles production system comprising a water pump, venturi system comprising pressure regulator tubes for water installations and fittings therefor, suction nozzles, hoses, jets, jet nozzles andpressure tank | ACTIVE | Feb 25, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2025 | ISCR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 10, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |