USPTO serial 97981282
MELO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NANNEY, KATHERINE N
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MELO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
REBECCA LIEBOWITZ
REBECCA LIEBOWITZ VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Non-alcoholic root- and plant-based beverages, namely, kava-based beverages; non-alcoholic sparkling root- and plant-based beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; non-alcoholic sparkling fruit juice beverages; non-alcoholic carbonated beverages; non-alcoholic cocktail bases; nonalcoholic cocktails; non-alcoholic punches; nonalcoholic distilled spirits; de-alcoholised drinks, namely, de-alcoholised kava-based beverages; alcohol free drinks in the nature of kava-based beverages; alcohol-free beverages in the nature of sparkling root- and plant-based beverages; alcohol free spirits | ACTIVE | Sep 8, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |