USPTO serial 97981552
TAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POMEROY-MURPHY, KAITLIN I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Frances Love
Mary Frances Love MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.125 S. ROYAL ST.ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products, namely, tomato paste; Vegetable pepper paste; Vegetable paste, namely, tomato and pepper paste mixes; Diced tomatoes; Peeled tomatoes; Canned, cooked or otherwise processed tomatoes; Tomato purée; Canned vegetables, namely, canned stews, canned peas, canned green beans, canned okra, canned artichoke, canned mushroom, garniture; Tinned sweet corn, namely, processed sweet corn; Processed beans, namely, borlotti beans in olive oil; Cooked beans, namely, cooked green beans in olive oil; Nut-based spread, namely, walnut spread; Hazelnut spread; Cooked beans, namely, stewed beans; Cooked beans, namely, stewed chickpeas; Cooked beans, namely, stewed borlotti; Processed stuffed grape leaves, namely, grapevine leaf rolls stuffed with rice; Processed eggplant, namely, fried eggplant; Processed eggplant, namely, roasted eggplant; Processed pepper, namely, roasted pepper; Fruit jams, namely, apricot jam, dried figs jam, raspberry jam, cherry jam, quince jam, strawberry jam, rose jam, peach jam; Sun-dried tomatoes; Hummus; Processed beans, namely, mashed broad beans; Baba ghanoush; Pickles; Preserved grapevine leaves | ACTIVE | Feb 13, 2024 |
| 030 | Fermented hot pepper paste, namely, gochujang; pepper paste for use as a seasoning; chili pepper pastes being condiments; tomato sauce; bean meal; hot chili pepper sauce; pesto sauce; ketchup; mayonnaise; aioli; curry mango sauce; barbecue sauce; Pesto sauce, namely, pesto rosso | ACTIVE | Feb 13, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 18, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |