USPTO serial 98000569
GCRVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADEAU, MADELINE JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GCRVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
Otto O. Lee INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP1871 THE ALAMEDA, SUITE 250SAN JOSE, CA 95126United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Devices for managing, monitoring, inspecting, controlling and protecting the operation of water mains and liquid-carrying pipelines, namely, computer peripheral devices and computer hardware with preinstalled software for collecting, logging, monitoring, processing, analyzing and displaying data on liquid quality, pressure, flow rates and corrosion, and monitoring, inspecting and controlling valves and pumps | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in managing, monitoring, inspecting, controlling and protecting the operation of water mains and liquid-carrying pipelines, namely, for collecting, logging, monitoring, processing, analyzing and displaying data on liquid quality, pressure, flow rates and corrosion, and for use in monitoring, inspecting and controlling valves and pumps in the field of operating water mains and liquid-carrying pipelines; providing Internet website portals for inspections of water mains and liquid pipelines featuring data about liquid quality, pressure, flow rates, and corrosion, valves and pumps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |