Drawing for VERIFIEDHUMAN

USPTO serial 98001395

VERIFIEDHUMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PHILLIPS, ALEXANDER J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VERIFIEDHUMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting public and industry awareness of the importance of verifying that works of authorship, artistic works, or other work product or content are made by humans versus by generative artificial intelligence and protecting the human creative process; Association services, namely, promoting public and industry awareness of the importance of verifying that works of authorship, artistic works, or other work product or content are made by humans versus by generative artificial intelligence and protecting the human creative process; providing a website promoting public and industry awareness of the importance of verifying that works of authorship, artistic works, or other work product or content are made by humans versus by generative artificial intelligence and protecting the human creative process; conducting audits to verify that works of authorship, artistic works, or other work product or content are created primarily by human(s) without significant use of generative artificial intelligenceACTIVEMay 11, 2023
042Developing standards, namely, development of voluntary standards for verifying works of authorship, artistic works, or other work product or content are created primarily by human(s) without significant use of generative artificial intelligence; Developing standards, namely, development of voluntary standards for artists, writers, musicians, organizations, and other content creators to verify their works of authorship, artistic works, or other work product or content are created primarily by human(s) without significant use of generative artificial intelligence; Developing standards, namely, development of voluntary standards for organizations to verify that they advocate for hiring human workers; developing standards, namely, development of voluntary standards for educational institutions to verify responsible use of artificial intelligence in the learning and teaching processesACTIVEMay 11, 2023

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2024GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2024GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2024NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 20, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance