Drawing for TRUETEST

USPTO serial 98010209

TRUETEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARSH, LAURA KATHLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUETEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher D. Casavale

Christopher D. Casavale NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP301 S. College StreetSuite 2300, IP DepartmentCHARLOTTE, NC 28202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software platform for autonomous test generation (ATG) conducted by artificial intelligence that automatically discovers, models, generates, and maintains user-journey test cases; downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for a test automation that automatically discovers, models, generates, and maintains user-journey test casesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2025TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 10, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2025NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2025DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 7, 2025AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 7, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 21, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2024DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2024ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 19, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2024ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 16, 2024PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 28, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 26, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance