USPTO serial 98011022
CODY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CODY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara L. Friedman
Barbara L. Friedman DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 2600OAKLAND, CA 94612United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for use in software development and coding, code generation, translation, and summarization, searching online code libraries and debugging and improving software code; Downloadable computer software in the nature of software extensions and plugins for code generation and software development; Downloadable computer software, namely, a code assistant that gives users the ability to search and answer questions about third-party code libraries, open source code, and the user's own codebase to create new code, review and compare existing code, and debug and improve software code; Downloadable computer software, namely, software development tools for use in collaborative software development | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2023 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in software development and coding, code generation, translation, and summarization, searching online code libraries and debugging and improving software code; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software, namely, a code assistant that gives users the ability to search and answer questions about third-party code libraries, open source code, and the user's own codebase to create new code, review and compare existing code, and debug and improve software code; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software, namely, software development tools for use in collaborative software development | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 21, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |