USPTO serial 98013133
ICLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOOR, AMIT KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ICLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jeju-si, Jeju-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
minchul yang
minchul yang STIP LAW GROUP40 W CHESAPEAKE AVE, STE 506TOWSON, MD 21204United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Electrical toothbrushes; brush for replacing electric toothbrush; heads for electric toothbrushes; electromotional toothbrushes; toothbrush stands; electric brush for removing make-up | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |