USPTO serial 98013799
E3GROWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAYSIDO, REBECCA TOLENTINO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E3GROWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ludwigshafen am Rhein, DE
Ludwigshafen am Rhein, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Floyd Trillis III
Floyd Trillis III CURATOLO SIDOTI & TRILLIS CO., LPA24500 CENTER RIDGE ROADSUITE 280CLEVELAND, OH 44145Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, plant genetics research and providing technological information about environmentally-conscious and green innovations, as well as scientific research and design services relating thereto in the field of plants; industrial analysis of chemicals, industrial research in the field of plants and industrial design services; quality control for others and authentication services in the field of plants; design and development of computers and software; installation, maintenance and updating of computer software; engineering services, particularly technical project planning of scientific research; engineering; provision of temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software applications and software tools for researching plants; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing and researching plants; hosting of software platforms of others on a virtual private server on the internet; IT platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for conducting information technology (IT) assessments; services relating to the implementation of certification systems, namely, testing, analysis, and evaluation of plants of others to determine conformity with certification standards; drafting and issuing standards, namely, developing quality control standards for agricultural practices; environmental inspection and quality control services for others; monitoring compliance with standards through testing, analysis, and evaluation of the agricultural goods of others to assure environmental compliance with industry standards; technical audits through computer technology auditing; auditing and evaluation of participants in the framework of certification systems by testing, analysis, and evaluation of the knowledge, skills, and abilities of others in the agricultural industry to determine conformity with certification standards; provision of accreditation information and advice to participants regarding certification systems through evaluating organizations to determine whether the organizations conform to an established accreditation standard; quality control services for others provided by consultants relating to quality control and services provided by consultants in connection with quality management, namely, quality evaluation and analysis, quality assurance, and quality control, in the field of agricultural practices, all the above-mentioned services also provided electronically or online from a computer database or via the internet; provision of scientific information relating to the aforesaid services in the field of agricultural practices; scientific advice relating to the aforesaid services in the field of agricultural practices | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Agricultural advisory and consultancy services relating to the use of non-chemical treatments for sustainable agriculture and horticulture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |