USPTO serial 98019585
ONLINE GOOD LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADORNO SANTOS, LUZ M.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONLINE GOOD LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
McLeansville, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUSTIN JOHANSON
JUSTIN JOHANSON RLAS4050 S. 500 W., SUITE 50 DPT# 14057SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84123United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of video game tournaments; Entertainment in the nature of casino gambling tournaments; Entertainment services, namely, providing online multiplayer video games; Gaming services in the nature of online computer game tournaments; Gaming services in the nature of providing online video games; Online gaming services in the nature of casino gambling; Online gaming services in the nature of sports gaming, namely, online sports betting services; Providing entertainment information about video game tournaments and competitions via a website; Providing entertainment information via a website; Providing entertainment information in the field of video games via a website; Arranging of contests featuring casino gaming and sports gaming; Entertainment services, namely, providing a website for on-line gambling; Gaming services in the nature of casino gaming; Providing a website featuring blogs, non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles, brochures, and blog posts, and nondownloadable videos in the field of video games; Providing a website featuring blogs, nondownloadable publications in the nature of articles, brochures, and blog posts, and nondownloadable videos in the field of gaming events; Providing a website featuring blogs, non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles, brochures, blog posts, and nondownloadable videos in the field of games and entertainment; Providing a website featuring blogs, non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles, brochures, and blog posts, and non-downloadable videos in the field of sports gaming; Providing an on-line computer web site notifying individuals that they have won a lottery or other forms of gambling, where one or more winning numbers have been picked; Providing online non-downloadable videos in the field of video games and video game reviews; Providing online non-downloadable videos in the field of casino gambling | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |