USPTO serial 98022198
EVOLUTION ADVISERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILL, MARK THOMAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVOLUTION ADVISERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Melbourne Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUSTIN JOHANSON
JUSTIN JOHANSON RLAS4050 S. 500 W., SUITE 50 DPT# 14057SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84123UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consultancy and information services relating to information technology architecture and infrastructure; Consulting in the field of IT project management; IT consulting services relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for content management; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for content services; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for security and incident management; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for business processes management; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to access and/or provide content management; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to access and/or provide content services; Business technology software consultation services; Computer technology consultancy; Information technology consulting relating to computer network design; Information technology consulting relating to computer software design; Outsource service provider in the field of information technology consulting relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for content management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for content services; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for security and incident management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for business processes management | ACTIVE | May 1, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |