USPTO serial 98023772
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Normandin, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl A. Clarkin, Esq.
CHERYL A. CLARKIN, ESQ. ADLER POLLOCK & SHEEHAN P.C.ONE CITIZENS PLAZA, 8TH FLOORPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | (Based on Intent to Use) Dietary fiber to aid digestion; Dietary supplements; Protein dietary supplements; Protein supplements(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Dietary fiber to aid digestion; Dietary supplements; Protein dietary supplements; Protein supplements | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (Based on Intent to Use) Bread mixes; Flour for food; Husked barley; Husked oats; Mixes for making cakes; Oat flakes; Pancake mixes; Pastry mixes; Pearl barley; Pizza crust mixes; Processed grains; Processed oats; Processed semolina; Processed wheat; Steel cut oats; Pulse flour for food(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Bread mixes; Flour for food; Husked barley; Husked oats; Mixes for making cakes; Oat flakes; Pancake mixes; Pastry mixes; Pearl barley; Pizza crust mixes; Processed grains; Processed oats; Processed semolina; Processed wheat; Steel cut oats; Pulse flour for food | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |