USPTO serial 98028169
CMC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYNES, SAMANTHA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CMC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KELLY J. KUBASTA
KELLY J. KUBASTA FERGUSON BRASWELL FRASER KUBASTA PC2500 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 600PLANO, TX 75093UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Metal oxide powders for industrial purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |