USPTO serial 98030784
OIZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NANNEY, KATHERINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OIZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Compression garments; Cosmetic apparatus using ultrasound for performing aesthetic skin treatment procedures; Electric esthetic massage apparatus for household purposes; Electric scalp massagers for household use; Foot massage apparatus; Laser therapy helmets for treating alopecia; Massage apparatus for eyes; Massage apparatus for neck and shoulders; Massage sticks; Massage stones; Massaging apparatus for personal use; Medical devices for nonsurgical cosmetic treatments; Scraping apparatus for gua sha therapy; Therapeutic hot and cold therapy packs; Thermotherapy apparatus for medical purposes | ACTIVE | May 24, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2025 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |