USPTO serial 98033441
OO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RENNEKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SEONGNAM, GYEONGGI-DO, KR
Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rodney L. Skoglund
Rodney L. Skoglund RENNER, KENNER, GREIVE, BOBAK, TAYLOR & WEBER CO.,106 SOUTH MAIN STREET, SUITE 400AKRON, OH 44308United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Personalized internet broadcasting services; data communication, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audiovisual recordings via the Internet; radio broadcasting; rental of message storage apparatus in the form of telecommunications apparatus; radio telecommunications access services; cable television transmission; providing internet chatrooms; internet broadcasting services; telecommunications services for providing multiple-user access to a global computer network; Electronic computer bulletin board services; communications by computer terminals; television broadcasting; transmission and reception of information on databases via telecommunication networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |