USPTO serial 98046086
BIOAERATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOAERATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan A. Winter
Jonathan A. Winter Farber LLC4 Corporate Drive, Suite 287Shelton, CT 06484United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Contract manufacturing for multi-product agronomic solutions in agriculture, namely, plant growth nutrients and substances for regulating plant growth for food, fuel, fiber, recreation, and land restoration; Contract manufacturing for fertilizers for domestic, horticultural and agricultural use; bio fertilizers; Contract manufacturing for soil amendments in the nature of soil additives and soil conditioners for agricultural, domestic and horticultural use; Contract manufacturing for agricultural preparations for crops, namely, plant nutrition preparations applied to plants that improve plant finishing and growth potential while also providing adjuvants and antioxidants; Contract manufacturing for nutrient and microbial preparations for the treatment of seeds, namely, plant growth nutrients and microbial inoculants for application to seeds used in agriculture; Contract manufacturing for plant growth nutrients and nutritive solutions in the nature of plant nutrition preparations with soil for agriculture, domestic, horticulture, landscape, nursery, hydroponics, turf care, tissue culture and foliar use; plant growth nutrients and nutritive solutions with and without soil for use in the fields of agriculture, domestic, horticulture, landscape, nursery, hydroponics, turf care, tissue culture and foliar applications; Contract manufacturing for plant growth nutrients and nutritive solutions in the nature of plant nutrition preparations without soil for agriculture, domestic, horticulture, landscape, nursery, hydroponics, turf care, tissue culture and foliar use; Contract manufacturing for nutrient uptake additive for fertilizer containing micronutrients for combating frost, strengthening osmotic pressure and protecting fruit plants, vegetables, cotton, peanuts, tobacco and other agronomic crops; Contract manufacturing for soil bacteria, namely, soil improving preparations for fairways, sports turf, lawn care, trees and ornamentals; Contract manufacturing for multi-product agronomic solutions in agriculture, namely, culture fluids for cultivating plant cells for food, fuel, fiber, recreation, and land restoration; environmentally-friendly insecticides and fungicides for horticultural and domestic use; Contract manufacturing for biological fungicide with soil for agriculture, domestic, horticulture, landscape, nursery, hydroponic, turf care, tissue culture and foliar use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2025 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 30, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |