USPTO serial 98050625
MANTIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SENSOR, JAMES EARL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MANTIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathaniel L. Fintz
Nathaniel L. Fintz ZUBER LAWLER LLP260 MADISON AVENUE, SUITE 8021NEW YORK, NY 10016United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching all publicly-available digital or digitized information for information relating to any type of alienable assets; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching all publicly-available digital or digitized information for information relating to the asset history of any type of alienable assets; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching for off-chain information about off-chain assets that are represented on-chain; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching all publicly-available digital or digitized information for information relating to intellectual property assets; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching all publicly-available digital or digitized information for information relating to real property assets; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching all publicly-available digital or digitized information for information relating to virtual property; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching a database featuring legal information; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for utilizing an online interactive database featuring legal information recorded in the form of text; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching information relating to assets; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching information about asset history; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching information relating to intellectual property assets; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching information relating to real property assets; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching information relating to virtual property; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for searching a database featuring legal information; Software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger, namely, downloadable computer software for an online interactive database featuring legal information recorded in the form of text; Software for analysis and description, namely, downloadable computer software for analysis and description of assets included on a distributed ledger; Software for analysis and reporting, namely, downloadable computer software for analysis and reporting of assets included on a distributed ledger | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |