USPTO serial 98064899
RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'ROURKE, JONATHAN RYAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon E. Holland
Jon E. Holland BUTLER SNOW LLP200 WEST SIDE SQUARE, SUITE 100HUNTSVILLE, AL 35801United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Technical consulting the field of cybersecurity risk management training; training in the fields of military weapons systems and military vehicles | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 042 | Engineering design services and software engineering services in the fields of military weapon systems and military vehicles; modeling and simulation in the nature of computer modeling in the fields of military weapons systems and military vehicles; wargame simulation, namely, providing temporary use of online non-downloadable simulation software for evaluating military strategies and tactics; computer security threat analysis for protecting data in the nature of data analysis in the fields of cybersecurity and military intelligence; technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence; technical consulting in the fields of designing and developing military and communication satellites | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 045 | Security threat analysis for protecting public safety in the nature of analysis and vulnerability assessment of military weapons systems, military vehicles, industrial control systems, and critical infrastructure; Security threat analysis for protecting public safety in the nature of military threat assessment; war game simulation in the nature of military science services, namely, analyzing war strategies | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 1, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |