Drawing for RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 98064899

RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'ROURKE, JONATHAN RYAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon E. Holland

Jon E. Holland BUTLER SNOW LLP200 WEST SIDE SQUARE, SUITE 100HUNTSVILLE, AL 35801United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Technical consulting the field of cybersecurity risk management training; training in the fields of military weapons systems and military vehiclesACTIVEDec 31, 1999
042Engineering design services and software engineering services in the fields of military weapon systems and military vehicles; modeling and simulation in the nature of computer modeling in the fields of military weapons systems and military vehicles; wargame simulation, namely, providing temporary use of online non-downloadable simulation software for evaluating military strategies and tactics; computer security threat analysis for protecting data in the nature of data analysis in the fields of cybersecurity and military intelligence; technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence; technical consulting in the fields of designing and developing military and communication satellitesACTIVEDec 31, 1999
045Security threat analysis for protecting public safety in the nature of analysis and vulnerability assessment of military weapons systems, military vehicles, industrial control systems, and critical infrastructure; Security threat analysis for protecting public safety in the nature of military threat assessment; war game simulation in the nature of military science services, namely, analyzing war strategiesACTIVEDec 31, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 12, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 6, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 5, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jul 1, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance