Drawing for SILVERBOX

USPTO serial 98065113

SILVERBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COGAN, BRITTNEY LORRAINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILVERBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew T. Rissler

Andrew T. Rissler PATEL & ALMEIDA PC20700 Ventura Blvd., Suite 235WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009headphones and headsets; batteries and battery chargers; smartwatches, wearable activity trackers; joysticks for use with computers, other than for video games; virtual reality headsets; smartglasses; extension cords, multiple-outlet power strips, surge protectors; microscopes, electronic microscopes, telescopes, binoculars; computer memory modules; memory cards; blank usb flash drives; Computer storage devices, namely, blank flash drives; hard disc drives; memory card readers; usb hubs; electric charging cables; data cables; video projectors; LCD projectors used to display advertisements; Electronic paper displays; Computer monitor mounts; Digital video cameras; Audio speakers; computer cases; Computer carrying cases; Video capture cards; Motherboards; Internal cooling fans for computers; computer networks adapters; Communication hub; Electric switches; Modems; Computer network routers; Signal splitters for electronic apparatus; Computer keyboards; Computer mouse; Mouse mats; Stick computersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2025EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2025AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2025TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 19, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2025EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 3, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance