Drawing for PERFOBLISS

USPTO serial 98069574

PERFOBLISS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BINCE, ASHLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFOBLISS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua M. Gerben, Esq.

Joshua M. Gerben, Esq. GERBEN PERROTT, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW, SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Vitamins for use in the manufacture of beverages; Ingredients in the nature of plant extracts, other than essential oils, for use in the manufacture of dietary and nutritional supplements; A proprietary blend of ingredients containing beetroot powder, L-arginine, L-citrulline and L-Carnitine for use in the manufacture of nutritional supplements; Ingredients in the nature of beetroot powder, L-arginine, L-citrulline and L-Carnitine for use in the manufacture of dietary and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—
005Dietary supplement ingredients, namely, a proprietary blend of ingredients containing beetroot powder, L-arginine, L-citrulline and L-Carnitine sold as a component of dietary supplements; Dietary and nutritional supplement ingredients, namely, beetroot powder, L-arginine, L-citrulline and L-Carnitine sold as a component of nutritional supplements and vitaminsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2024XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2024GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2024GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2024CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance