USPTO serial 98070338
SIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth A. Walker
Elizabeth A. Walker Danielson Legal LLCOne Mifflin Place, Suite 400Cambridge, MA 02138United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Training services in the field of fraud; education services, namely, classes, webinars, and blog posts in the field of fraud; providing seminars, webinars, and workshops in the field of fraud; providing training services in the field of online fraud, related to the risks and sources of fraud, and comprehensive detection and prevention techniques and solutions; providing education services, namely, classes, webinars, and blog posts in the field of online fraud, related to the risks and sources of fraud, and comprehensive detection and prevention techniques and solutions; providing online non-downloadable publications in the field of fraud; providing online blogs, podcasts, webinars, e-books, and reports in the field of fraud | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2022 |
| 042 | Providing online, non-downloadable software for monitoring and analyzing the integrity of and risk presented by online user-generated content; Providing online, non-downloadable software for automating online fraud prediction and prevention; Providing online, non-downloadable software for facilitating fraud prevention in the field of online user account creation and utilization, online payments, promotional programs, and online transactions; providing online, non-downloadable software for preventing fraud by preventing online accounts from being compromised; providing online, non-downloadable software for facilitating fraud prevention for user interactions across all of a business's web sites and mobile applications; providing online, non-downloadable software for identifying emerging fraud trends, and for custom modeling and comprehensive reporting of a business's data regarding fraudulent transactions, account abuse and malicious content; providing online, non-downloadable software for facilitating fraud prevention in the field of chargeback losses; providing online, non-downloadable software for facilitating and managing chargeback disputes; fraud prevention services, namely, electronic monitoring, detection and prevention of fraud in the fields of online user account creation and utilization, online payments, promotional programs, chargeback disputes, and other online transactions; online fraud prevention services, namely, review of data and transactions from customers, processing same through machine learning models, and advising customers of existence of fraudulent transaction or event; chargeback dispute services, namely, compiling the data and managing the chargeback dispute through resolution; consulting services in the field of fraud; software consulting services in the field of online fraud; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software; technical support services, namely, monitoring and maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 1, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |