USPTO serial 98072757
IDENTITY KINGDOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, BRIA MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDENTITY KINGDOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor Sapphire
Victor Sapphire LAW OFFICE OF VICTOR SAPPHIRE7190 SUNSET BLVD STE 116LOS ANGELES, CA 90046United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Identification verification services, namely, providing user authentication of personal information using single sign-on technology, biometric hardware and software technology for business purposes in the nature of e-commerce transactions; Identity verification services, namely, credit holder user authentication services using single sign-on technology, biometric hardware and software technology for business and personal purposes in the nature of e-commerce transactions; Fraud detection services in the nature of electronic monitoring of credit card activity to detect fraud via the Internet; Identity user verification services, namely, providing user authentication of personal identification information in the fields of gaming, finance, credit, medical records and psychological profiling using single sign-on technology, biometric hardware and software technology for business and personal purposes in the nature of e-commerce transactions and secure entry and exit door access; Fraud detection services in the field of credit cards for on-line purchasing in the nature of electronic monitoring of credit card activity to detect fraud via the Internet; Fraud detection services in the field of credit cards, debit cards, and payment cards for financial transactions in the nature of electronic monitoring of credit, debit and payment card transactions to detect fraud via the Internet; Fraud and identity theft protection services in the nature of electronic monitoring of personally identifying information to detect identity theft via the Internet; Fraud detection services in the field of insurance, credit cards, banking, retail and financial transactions in the nature of electronic monitoring of insurance, credit card, banking. retail and financial transactions to detect fraud via the Internet; Providing fraud detection services for electronic funds transfer, credit and debit card and electronic check transactions via a global computer network in the nature of electronic monitoring of funds transfer, credit card, debit card and electronic check transactions to detect fraud via the Internet; Software as a service featuring software to reduce charge backs and aid the resolution of billing inquiries and disputes; Identity verification services, namely, providing credit holder user authentication of credit card transactions via a global computer network using single sign-on technology, biometric hardware and software technology for personal and business purposes in the nature of e-commerce transactions; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for use as an electronic wallet that allows users to send, receive, store, and safeguard digital currency; providing a secure, website featuring technology that enables users to remotely access, send, receive, store, and manage digital currency; providing a website that gives users the ability to create customized web pages featuring user-defined profiles; application service provider featuring application programming interface software for integration of financial transactions into websites and mobile applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2024 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |