USPTO serial 98076970
ASCEND NOTIFY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASCEND NOTIFY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald McDonald
Gerald McDonald PICKREL SCHAEFFER & EBELING40 N. MAIN STREET SUITE 2700,DAYTON, OH 45423UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | transmission and forwarding of text message notification alerts that allow public health departments and other community health organizations to immediately send a text message to those most at risk in their communit | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2023 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software that provides emergency health related notifications for use in the field of public health; Providing use of a non-downloadable web-based software application that enables the electronic transmission of messages and data regarding emergency health situations or critical community alerts; Application service provider, namely, providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for remote data management of wireless delivery of emergency health notifications to computers and mobile electronic devices for use in the field of health care; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use for the delivery of emergency health alert messages via telecommunications and computer networks to computer and telephony devices for use by public health departments and other community health organizations | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |