Drawing for CUSTOMER CONFIDENCE CHRONICLES

USPTO serial 98079411

CUSTOMER CONFIDENCE CHRONICLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUSTOMER CONFIDENCE CHRONICLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth A. KNOX

Kenneth A. KNOX Perilla Knox & Hildebrandt LLP5871 Glenridge DriveSuite 350Atlanta, GA 30328

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Engineering services in the field of reducing carbon dioxide emissions; Testing, analysis and evaluation of metal tools, machinery and fabrication equipment; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to view products and case studies in the fields of process and analytical instrumentation, industrial machinery, biopharmaceutical, food, beverage, dairy, oil and gas, power generation, chemical, petrochemical, alternative fuels, shipbuilding, pulp and paper, and semi-conductor technologies; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of goods of others for the purpose of certification, engineering consultancy, chemistry consultancy in the fields of process and analytical instrumentation, industrial machinery, biopharmaceutical, food, beverage, dairy, oil and gas, power generation, chemical, petrochemical, alternative fuels, shipbuilding, pulp and paper, and semi-conductor technologies; Quality control for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance