USPTO serial 98084177
LB LERCH BATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LB LERCH BATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan S. Thompson
Alan S. Thompson LOHF SHAIMAN JACOBS PC950 S. CHERRY ST.950 S. CHERRY ST., SUITE 300DENVER, CO 80246Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consultation services in the field of design, sustainability and use of building infrastructure and systems | ACTIVE | Sep 13, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2024 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 27, 2024 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 17, 2024 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2024 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jul 17, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |