USPTO serial 98089175
SENTINELX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SENTINELX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin McDermott
4097 MONUMENT CORNER DRIVE, SUITE 550FAIRFAX, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Non-downloadable computer software for use in detecting AI-generated audio data; Non-downloadable computer software for use in detecting audio data generated by software using artificial intelligence; Non-downloadable computer software for use in detecting synthetic speech; Non-downloadable computer software for use in detecting cloned speech | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in detecting audio data generated by software using artificial intelligence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in detecting AI-generated audio data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in detecting synthetic and/or cloned speech generated by software using artificial intelligence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in detecting synthetic and/or cloned speech; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications to detect audio data generated by software using artificial intelligence; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications to detect AI-generated audio data; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for use in detecting synthetic and/or cloned speech generated by software using artificial intelligence; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications to detect synthetic and/or cloned speech; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software to detect audio data generated by software using artificial intelligence; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software to detect AI-generated audio data; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in detecting synthetic and/or cloned speech generated by software using artificial intelligence; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for use in detecting synthetic and/or cloned speech | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |