USPTO serial 98096095
MODULAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NKOJO, RHODA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MODULAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Curley
Michael J. Curley QUARLES & BRADY LLPONE SOUTH CHURCH AVENUE, SUITE 1800TUCSON, AZ 85701United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic integrated control systems for use in the field of managing open pit and underground mining operations, comprised of a central digital computer, circuit boards, power supplies and also including processors, electronic field display panels for installation in trucks, crushers, related mining machines used remotely within a mine, associated recorded software for operating mining machines, modems, and radio transceivers for linking said electronic field panels to said digital computer using global positioning and receiving and displaying information from said electronic field panels on the central digital computer | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring computer software applications and platforms for collecting and disseminating data, planning and operational decision-making regarding mine operations, mine management, mine vehicle navigation and dispatching, routing and movement of mine vehicles and equipment, mine optimization, mine personnel management and mine material movement, for mining extraction services, blending and processing of materials in and around a mining environment, mine vehicle and heavy equipment operation, navigation, operator guidance and autonomy, mining supervisory tasks being routing and direction of mine vehicles and equipment, and mine vehicle, equipment and facilities maintenance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 27, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |