USPTO serial 98098392
PHOENIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAUCETTE, MAX CLIFFORD STE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHOENIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Stone Levy
Jessica Stone Levy STONE LEVY LLC4950 S. YOSEMITE ST., F2-354GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for use in scientific research; telepresence robots; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence and human-like hands for assisting people with tasks that require manual dexterity; downloadable software for telepresence robots for assisting people to perform labor tasks; Telepresence robots with automation software; downloadable automation software for telepresence robots for assisting people to perform labor tasks; General-purpose humanoid robots having communication and learning functions for use in assisting people perform labor tasks; downloadable software for general purpose humanoid robots for assisting people to perform labor tasks; Humanoid robots with human-like intelligence for use in scientific research and performing related tasks; downloadable software for humanoid robots with human-like intelligence for assisting people to perform labor tasks; Humanoid robots with human-like hands for assisting people in performing tasks that require manual dexterity; downloadable software for humanoid robots with human-like hands for use in performing tasks that require manual dexterity, namely, software for assisting people to perform labor tasks; Autonomous humanoid robots for use in performing general labor tasks, namely, for assisting people with tasks that require manual dexterity; downloadable software for autonomous humanoid robots for use in performing general labor tasks, namely, assisting people to perform labor tasks; Autonomous general-purpose robots for use in performing general labor tasks, namely, assisting people to perform labor tasks; downloadable software for autonomous general-purpose robots for use in performing general labor tasks, namely, software for assisting people to perform labor tasks; Teleoperated humanoid robots with human-like hands for performing tasks that require manual dexterity, namely, assisting people to perform labor tasks; downloadable software for teleoperated humanoid robots with human-like hands for performing tasks that require manual dexterity, namely, software for assisting people to perform labor tasks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |