USPTO serial 98100911
HYPRPLANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAUENSTEIN, HOLLAND LESLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYPRPLANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRENDAN J. HUGHES
BRENDAN J. HUGHES COOLEY LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of renewable energy generation systems; technological research in relation to the design and development of hydrogen systems for energy generation; preparation of technical studies, namely, conducting scientific feasibility studies; provision of information regarding scientific research and technical project studies relating to the use of renewable natural energy; scientific analysis regarding third-party energy and electricity needs; technical advice in connection with energy-saving measures, namely, energy measurement to improve energy efficiency; energy auditing; consultancy relating to technological services in the field of energy supply, namely, energy measurement consultancy; development of energy management systems; design and development of energy distribution networks; scientific research in the field of energy; conducting scientific research and technical project studies relating to the use of natural energy; advisory services relating to energy consumption, namely, advice related to the development of new products for energy consumption; Research in the fields of power conversion and hydrogen fuel cells; development of hydrogen infrastructures and hydrogen refilling installations; Providing research data and information with regard to reducing carbon emissions and decarbonization; consultation services in the fields of clean energy, renewable energy storage, industrial decarbonization, disaster resilience, fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) and renewable hydrogen infrastructure for transportation; industrial analysis, industrial research and industrial design services; environmental sustainability consultancy and assessment services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |