USPTO serial 98103325
MOBY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOBY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lucas S. Michels
Lucas S. Michels AMPACC LAW GROUP, PLLC3500 188th Street S.W., Suite 103Lynnwood, WA 98037United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | autonomous mobile industrial robots; autonomous mobile industrial robots equipped with a robot arm; automatic control mechanisms for robots, namely, electric motors for machines with a digital servo drive controller; control mechanisms for industrial robots, namely, electric motors for machines with a digital servo drive controller; control mechanisms for robots, namely, electric motors for machines with a digital servo drive controller; driving devices for robots, namely, drives for motors; industrial robots; module system for consisting of robotic palletization carriers being industrial robots; motion control mechanisms for robots, namely, pneumatic valve actuators, hydraulic valve actuators, vision, proximity, and tactile sensors, and controls sold as an integral component of industrial robots; robotic arms being industrial robots; semi or full automatic module system for consisting of robotic palletization carriers in the nature of industrial robots and material handling machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | autonomous mobile self-driving delivery robots; autonomous mobile self-driving delivery robots equipped with a robot arm; robotic cars; self-driving robots for delivery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |